When is a Destroyer not a Destroyer? When its a Contre-Torpilleur? The French did not really use the term Destroyer dividing their smaller warships into Torpileurs (Torpedo Craft) and larger Contre-Torpilleurs (anti-Torpedo Craft) harkening back to the days of Torpedo Boats and Torpedo Boat Destroyers (Pre-World War One)
Still the French Contre-Torpilleur of Le Fantasque class are something of a special case. They are big over 400 feet long with a beam of 39 feet. They have 5 5.5 inch guns, two triple torpedo launcher, depth charges and mines. Their AA as built is bit light with two 37mm AA guns and pair of AA Machineguns.Speed is a key factor with a top speed 37 knots. Tactically there role was to race ahead and intercept opponents armed with torpedoes and put them down fast and hard. Thus the focus on speed and a relatively heavy guns.
The United States Navy thought of these ships are Light cruisers you'll also see the term "super destroyer" thrown around. Comparing Le Fantasque to the Atlanta class you can see the point. The Atlanta is 530 feet long compared to the 434 feet length of the Fantastique. Also the Fantastique were built to counter a class of Italian light cruiser (the Condottieri) I would argue they are just on the Destroyer side of the line (though only just).





















































